Antibiotics and vitamin C could kill cancer cells

Published 16 Jun 2017 • Updated 23 May 2019 • By Louise Bollecker

Antibiotics and vitamin C could kill cancer cells

"Vitamin C and antibiotics could be up to 100 times more effective than drugs at killing cancer cells – without the side effects," reports the Mail Online. The news comes from the results of a study that found a new two-pronged approach using the antibiotic doxycycline followed by vitamin C could kill cancer cells.

Doxycycline killed many cancer cells, but others became resistant. The resistant cells were then destroyed by vitamin C.

While this is encouraging news, it needs to be put into context. The experiments all took place in the laboratory. Researchers used human breast cancer stem cells, but didn't perform any studies on animals or humans.

This means we don't know how successful this strategy could be – and the Mail's claim there would be no side effects is unsupported.

Though both doxycycline and vitamin C are safe to use in humans, more research is needed to find out how they interact with other cancer treatments and therapies before this can be recommended as a new approach to treating cancer.

Where did the story come from?

The study was carried out by researchers from the University of Calabria in Italy, and the University of Manchester and the University of Salford in the UK.

It was funded by both UK universities, the Healthy Life Foundation, the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), the European Union, and various private donations.

The study was published in the peer-reviewed journal Oncotarget on an open access basis, so it's free to read online.

The Mail reported on the study reasonably accurately, but didn't point out clinical trials are needed to see if the approach would be effective – and safe – in humans.

What kind of research was this?

This research involved a series of laboratory experiments performed on human cancer stem cells.

Although both doxycycline and vitamin C are safe to use in humans, we don't know whether the dose and combination required to kill cancer cells would be toxic in other ways.

Trials in animals first and then in humans are needed to eliminate this possibility.

What did the research involve?

The researchers performed a variety of experiments on human breast cancer stem cells. These are cells that are able to divide and become any type of cell the tumour needs in order to grow.

Cancer stem cells are different from most normal cells in that they can produce energy from glucose through a variety of pathways. This is one of the reasons they're able to grow and replicate better than normal cells.

Most also have an increased number of mitochondria – the powerhouse of cells – which can convert glucose into energy using oxygen. And one of the side effects of doxycycline is it inhibits the production of proteins required by mitochondria.

Previous research has suggested that by stopping the protein production, doxycycline could kill the cancer cells because they wouldn't be able to make energy.

But because cancer cells are good at adapting, there were concerns that some cancer cells would become drug resistant by using a different pathway to create energy, such as glycolysis.

This happens when certain cells, such as muscles, continue to work hard without oxygen, producing a build-up of lactic acid, and doesn't require oxygen or mitochondria.

This study looked at whether two natural products and six different drugs already approved for use in humans could kill cancer cells reliant on making energy using glycolysis – or in other words, kill the cancer cells that had resisted the initial treatment with doxycycline.

The natural products were vitamin C and berberine, a type of salt found in many plants.

The drugs included:
- chloroquine (antimalarial)
- atovaquone
- irinotecan
- sorafenib
- niclosamide
- stiripentol

What were the basic results?

Doxycycline reduced the cancer cells' ability to use different energy pathways. It did this by supressing the production of proteins important for mitochondrial function.

This wiped out many cancer cells, although some did became drug resistant. The doxycycline-resistant cells were then mostly reliant on the glycolysis pathway for energy production.

All of the drugs and natural products had some success in preventing these doxycycline-resistant cancer stem cells dividing. Vitamin C was the most successful.

The cells were 4-10 times more sensitive to vitamin C than cancer cells not resistant to doxycycline.

How did the researchers interpret the results?

The researchers concluded that doxycycline can kill some cancer cells and make others reliant on one energy pathway: glycolysis.

The doxycycline-resistant cells are then susceptible to natural products like vitamin C and drugs including chloroquine.

This, they say, "suggest[s] a new synthetic lethal strategy of i) doxycycline (to target mitochondria) and ii) vitamin C (to target glycolysis)."


This isn't the first time vitamin C has been studied for use against cancer: it has previously been shown to kill cancer cells in the laboratory and stop cancer growth in mice.

This new two-pronged approach may well prove to be useful in eradicating cancer stem cells in humans, but robust clinical trials are necessary first as cells can behave very differently in a laboratory environment.

Although all the drugs and natural products used in this study are already approved for use in humans, we don't know for certain what concentration would be required to obtain similar effects without being toxic.

This study also only looked at breast cancer stem cells. We don't know what effect the combination would have on other types of cancer cells, which stage of treatment this might be useful for, or for which types of cancer.


avatar Louise Bollecker

Author: Louise Bollecker, Community Manager France

Community Manager of Carenity in France, Louise is also editor-in-chief of the Health Magazine to provide articles, videos and testimonials that focus on patients' experiences and making their voices heard. With a... >> Learn more

1 comment

on 26/07/2020

I always believed that cancer was a thing, like breast cancer and colon cancer were the same sort of cells but apparently they’re not. I was told by my consultant, Professor John Snowden, that each cancer is different. What I did n’t get the chance to ask him was, how do they all become labelled under the same umbrella as cancer?
Is it because they eat you alive as does MRSA but that’s different. What makes each illness such as what I have, Multiple Myeloma and cancer of anywhere else in the body, be called cancer, if they’re all different and would MRSA be classed as a cancer?

You will also like

Hot dogs, bacon and other processed meats cause cancer, WHO declares


Hot dogs, bacon and other processed meats cause cancer, WHO declares

Read the article
World Cancer Day: Facts and Insights!

Adrenocortical carcinoma
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma
Bladder cancer
Brain tumour
Breast cancer
Catecholamine-secreting tumour
Cervical cancer
Colorectal cancer
Cutaneous lymphoma
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Endocrine cancer
Endocrine tumour
Endometrial cancer
Enteropancreatic endocrine tumour
Ewing sarcoma
Follicular lymphoma
Gallbladder cancer
Gastrointestinal stromal tumour
Glial tumour
Hodgkin lymphoma
Kaposi sarcoma
Larynx cancer
Liver cancer
Lung cancer
Malignant tumour of the fallopian tube
Mantle cell lymphoma
Merkel tumour
Multiple endocrine neoplasia
Multiple myeloma
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Ollier disease
Pancreatic cancer
Primary peritoneal tumour
Prostate cancer
Pseudomyxoma peritonei
Rare bone tumour
Renal cancer
Rhabdoid tumour
Sézary syndrome
Skin cancer
Small cell lung cancer
Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck
Systemic mastocytosis
Testicular cancer
Thyroid cancer
Tumours of the heart
Waldenström macroglobulinemia
xyz_Colon cancer

World Cancer Day: Facts and Insights!

Read the article
Bowel cancer: pain, treatments and mental health

Colorectal cancer
Larynx cancer

Bowel cancer: pain, treatments and mental health

See the testimonial
Revisting a Breast Cancer patient one year later

Breast cancer

Revisting a Breast Cancer patient one year later

See the testimonial

Most commented discussions

Fact sheets